Ageless Forever — TRT Clinic in Las Vegas, NV

Ageless Forever has built one of the more credible longevity and hormone optimization practices in the Las Vegas Valley, drawing patients who have cycled through other clinics and arrived here looking for something more methodical. With 143 Google reviews averaging 4.8 stars and a service menu spanning testosterone replacement, peptide therapy, medical weight loss, stem cell therapy, acoustic wave treatment, and metabolic testing, the practice operates as a broad-spectrum optimization clinic rather than a single-specialty shop. The depth of the review record, 116 verified Google entries spanning from 2015 through mid-2026, gives a clearer-than-usual picture of what patients actually experience once they walk through the door on South Rainbow Boulevard.

---

What Verified Reviews Actually Surface About This Las Vegas Clinic

Of 116 scraped Google reviews, 108 carry five stars, one carries four, and seven carry one star. That distribution is unusually polarized: almost no middle ground. The most frequently surfaced theme is staff quality, appearing in 60 reviews (51.7%). Subjective results follow at 53 reviews (45.7%), and prescriber quality appears in 41 reviews (35.3%). Communication surfaces in 29 reviews (25%), and support-team quality in 25 (21.6%).

What those numbers mean in practice: patients most often write about the people, not the protocols. The clinical team, specifically Dr. John Pierce, physician assistant Tuan Khuu, and support staff members Kerry and Amanda, appear by name across dozens of entries. That level of named-staff frequency in organic reviews is relatively rare and suggests genuine relationship continuity rather than transactional care.

Specific, measurable results appear in 13 reviews (11.2%), which is the more conservative category. Those entries include documented body composition changes, CGM monitoring experiences, and wardrobe-size milestones. Lab work quality surfaces in 12 reviews (10.3%), and follow-up care in another 12. The follow-up theme is notable: patients describe an online portal with same-day response describes the goal of and biweekly check-ins, which appears to be a structural feature of the practice rather than an exception.

---

The Clinical Team: Dr. Pierce, Kerry, Amanda, and Tuan

The review record at this Las Vegas clinic is unusually staff-specific. Dr. John Pierce is the most-cited provider, described consistently as someone who reads lab results in detail, adjusts protocols to individual physiology rather than applying standard templates, and takes time during appointments that other practices reportedly rush through.

Kerry Cutler, a support clinician referenced in multiple reviews, draws specific praise for bloodwork follow-through and patient communication. One reviewer described arriving at the clinic depressed, lethargic, and unmotivated, and credited Kerry's step-by-step bloodwork review as central to their recovery. Amanda, referenced in weight loss and fitness contexts, appears to operate in a nutrition and body composition coaching capacity, with patients describing biweekly sessions and customized workout planning. PA Tuan Khuu is mentioned in the context of coordinating complex cases and providing clarity during difficult diagnoses.

---

Results Patients Report: Body Composition, Energy, and Hormone Optimization

The results-specific review category (13 reviews) contains the most concrete data points available from the patient record. One reviewer reported losing nearly 15 pounds in approximately one month while working with Amanda on nutrition. Another described being in "the best shape of my life" after six months, with a new wardrobe to reflect it. A third reported reaching 10% body fat and attributed the outcome to the combined protocol approach after having tried three other clinics first.

In the hormone-specific context, reviewers describe improvements in energy, motivation, mood, and recovery. One patient who had been a client for nearly four years described arriving with "typical mid-life changes" and reported performing at their best after sustained care. These are self-reported outcomes, not clinical measurements, but the volume and consistency of the theme across independent reviews suggests a pattern rather than isolated anecdote.

A continuous glucose monitor (CGM) appears in at least one review as a monitoring tool the practice introduced to a patient, indicating the clinic uses wearable metabolic data in some protocols. That kind of instrumented follow-up is not standard across all Las Vegas hormone clinics and reflects the metabolic testing service listed in the practice's menu.

---

The Honest Breakdown: Where the Practice Earns Friction

Seven of 116 reviews carry one star. The source data does not include verbatim text from those entries, so specific complaints cannot be quoted directly. What the sentiment breakdown does reveal: four of the 29 communication-themed reviews carry negative sentiment, and one each in staff quality, prescriber quality, support team, and lab work carry negative scores. That pattern suggests the friction points, when they occur, cluster around communication rather than clinical outcomes.

The practice does not appear to have a significant volume of three-star reviews (zero in the dataset), which means patients who had mixed experiences either didn't leave reviews or escalated to one-star entries. That binary pattern is worth noting for prospective patients: the experience here seems to be strongly positive or, in a small number of cases, significantly disappointing. There is almost no recorded middle ground.

For patients who have had communication difficulties at other clinics and prioritize responsiveness, the online portal with end-of-day response describes the goal of mentioned in reviews may be a relevant factor. For those who have had negative experiences at this specific practice, the communication theme in negative sentiment data suggests that is where the breakdown most commonly occurs.

---

When Ageless Forever Is Not the Right Fit

This Las Vegas clinic operates with a preventative and optimization philosophy. One reviewer described the approach explicitly: lifestyle changes, dietary recommendations, and stress monitoring come before prescriptions. That sequencing suits patients who want a deliberate, data-driven process. Patients seeking fast pharmacological intervention without a comprehensive intake process may find the pace frustrating.

The practice appears to serve both men and women across hormone, weight, aesthetics, and regenerative categories. The review record includes female patients discussing thyroid and hormone care alongside male patients discussing testosterone and sexual health. Patients looking for a single-service clinic (testosterone replacement only, for example) may find the breadth of the menu either appealing or unnecessary depending on their goals.

Hours data shows Thursday availability from 8 AM to 5 PM. The full weekly schedule is not captured in the source data, so prospective patients with tight scheduling constraints should confirm availability directly before committing.

---

How Ageless Forever Compares to Nearby Las Vegas Clinics

The Las Vegas market includes several competing hormone and men's health practices. The table below reflects available data from the source record.

Ageless Forever carries the largest review volume of any clinic in this comparison set, which gives its 4.8 average more statistical weight than the 5.0 from Advanced TRT Clinic (2 reviews) or the 4.9 from TRT MD Las Vegas (55 reviews). TRT MD Las Vegas and Gameday Men's Health are the most direct comparables in terms of service overlap and review credibility. Ageless Men's Health shares a name similarity but appears to be a separate entity.

The distinguishing factor in the Ageless Forever review record is the multi-service integration: patients describe working with Dr. Pierce on hormones while simultaneously working with Amanda on nutrition and body composition, with Kerry managing bloodwork follow-through. That coordinated team model is less visible in the review records of the comparison clinics.

---

Services Offered at This Las Vegas Location

The practice at 6020 S Rainbow Blvd covers the following categories:

Hormone Optimization: Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT), HGH therapy, peptide therapy, thyroid treatment, DHEA therapy

Sexual Health: ED treatment, acoustic wave therapy, P-Shot, general sexual health

Weight and Metabolism: Medical weight loss, body composition analysis, metabolic testing

Regenerative and Advanced: Stem cell therapy, cryotherapy, PRP therapy

Aesthetics and Skin: Hair restoration, aesthetics, skin health

The combination of regenerative therapies (stem cell, PRP, cryotherapy) alongside hormone optimization and medical weight loss is not standard across all Las Vegas clinics. Patients with interests across multiple categories may find the single-location access relevant. Each service area has its own clinical considerations, and the review record suggests protocols are individualized based on lab results rather than applied uniformly.

---

Frequently Asked Questions, Drawn from Patient Review Themes

Q: Does Dr. Pierce actually spend time reviewing lab results, or is it a brief consultation?

Multiple reviews address this directly. Patients describe detailed bloodwork reviews, individualized protocol adjustments, and appointments that don't feel rushed. One patient who had been a client for nearly four years described the lab review process as central to their ongoing care.

The prescriber quality theme appears in 41 of 116 reviews (35.3%), with 40 of those carrying positive sentiment. That volume suggests the lab-review experience is consistent rather than exceptional.

---

Q: Is the practice suitable for women, or is it primarily men's health?

The review record includes female patients describing hormone care, thyroid treatment, and weight management. Kerry Cutler is specifically named by female reviewers in multiple entries. The service menu includes thyroid treatment and DHEA therapy alongside the more male-associated TRT and ED categories.

The practice does not appear to be positioned as exclusively men's health based on the available review data.

---

Q: How responsive is the team between appointments?

Communication surfaces in 29 reviews (25%), with 25 carrying positive sentiment and 4 negative. Patients describe an online portal that provides access to the clinical team with a guaranteed end-of-day response. One reviewer who relocated to Las Vegas specifically noted this feature as a differentiator.

The four negative communication-sentiment reviews suggest the system is not flawless, but the 25-to-4 positive-to-negative ratio indicates it functions reliably for most patients.

---

Q: What does the weight loss program actually involve?

The review record describes a combination of prescription support, nutrition planning, biweekly check-ins with Amanda, and body composition tracking. One patient described being "never hungry" while losing nearly 15 pounds in a month. Another described a full wardrobe change after six months. The program appears to incorporate dietary customization around restrictions and preferences rather than a standard meal plan.

Metabolic testing and body composition analysis are listed services, suggesting the program uses objective measurement rather than self-reported tracking alone.

---

Q: Does the practice prescribe immediately, or is there a process?

Based on reviewer descriptions, the clinic follows a preventative-first model. One patient described the approach as recommending "healthy foods and supplements, lifestyle changes, and monitoring stress levels before prescribing medicine." Lab work appears to precede protocol decisions. Patients looking for immediate prescription access without a structured intake may find this approach slower than expected.

---

Q: How long do patients typically stay with the practice?

The review record includes patients describing care periods of one year, nearly four years, and six months with ongoing plans. One reviewer described being a client since 2015 based on the date range in the data. The follow-up care theme appears in 12 reviews, all with positive sentiment, suggesting retention is a genuine feature of the practice rather than a marketing claim.

---

Q: Is the nutrition and fitness coaching separate from the medical care?

Based on review descriptions, Amanda operates in a fitness and nutrition capacity while Dr. Pierce manages the medical and hormone side. Patients describe seeing both providers independently and in coordination. One reviewer described biweekly sessions with Amanda alongside monthly or periodic visits with Dr. Pierce, with Kerry managing bloodwork follow-through in between.

Whether the coaching services are bundled or billed separately is not addressed in the available review or source data.

---

Q: Does the practice use wearable or continuous monitoring tools?

At least one reviewer describes receiving a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) to track glucose levels as part of their care. The metabolic testing service listed in the practice menu is consistent with this approach. The reviewer credited the CGM with making them "more conscious of my choices throughout the day." This level of instrumented monitoring is not described in reviews from the comparison clinics in the local market.

---

Q: What happens if a patient has a difficult or complex diagnosis?

One detailed review describes a family receiving difficult medical news and credits both Dr. Pierce and PA Tuan Khuu with explaining the diagnosis clearly, discussing options, and coordinating next steps. The review describes the experience as providing "reassurance during a very stressful time." Complex case coordination does not appear to be outside the scope of what the practice handles.

---

Q: How does Ageless Forever compare if a patient has tried other clinics?

Multiple reviewers mention prior clinic experiences. One described trying three other clinics before arriving at this Las Vegas practice. Another described relocating to the city and searching for a new men's health clinic. In both cases, the reviewer described the current practice as a significant improvement, specifically citing the non-cookie-cutter protocol approach and the preventative philosophy.

---

Rating and review data reflect verified Google reviews as of the date range captured in the source dataset (earliest: September 2015; latest: June 2026). All verbatim quotes are reproduced as written, with minor HTML formatting removed. Patient names are represented by initials only.

---

This is not a treatment recommendation. It is a directory entry. Any treatment decision belongs with a licensed physician who can examine the patient and evaluate their specific case.