Select Health and Wellness — ED Treatment Clinic in Fleming Island, FL

Fleming Island sits in Clay County, roughly 25 miles southwest of Jacksonville, in a corridor that has quietly become one of Northeast Florida's more competitive markets for integrative and regenerative medicine. Select Health and Wellness, operating out of a multi-suite space at 1845 E West Pkwy, occupies a distinct lane in that market: a practice built around Dr. Fritz and a treatment menu that spans regenerative injections, energy-based therapies, and IV protocols, all under one roof. With 166 verified Google reviews averaging 4.95 stars, the clinic's patient record is unusually consistent for a practice of its size and service breadth.

What follows is an editorial summary drawn from verified patient review data and confirmed source information.

---

What Select Health and Wellness Offers in Fleming Island

The Fleming Island location [source: https://www.selecthealthandwellness.com/location/fleming-island-florida] carries a service menu that covers eight distinct treatment categories. Stem Cell Therapy and PRP Therapy represent the regenerative injection side of the practice. Red Light Therapy and PEMF Therapy occupy the energy-based modality category. IV Therapy and NAD+ Therapy round out the infusion offerings. ED Treatment and Acoustic Wave Therapy address men's sexual health concerns.

That breadth matters in practical terms. Patients dealing with musculoskeletal pain, metabolic concerns, and energy or hormonal issues can access multiple treatment modalities without transferring between providers. Several reviewers describe this consolidation as a meaningful differentiator, using phrases like "one-stop shop" to characterize the experience. The clinic operates Monday through Wednesday and Friday through Saturday, with Thursday listed as closed [source: clinic hours data].

The practice is led by Dr. Fritz, who appears by name in a substantial portion of the 166 reviews. Reviewers consistently describe him as knowledgeable, engaged, and willing to explain treatment rationale in detail rather than routing patients through a generic protocol.

---

What Verified Reviews Surface: Themes Across 166 Patients

The review dataset spans February 2024 through April 2026, with 162 of 166 reviews rated at five stars. The star distribution breaks down as follows: 162 five-star reviews, 2 four-star, 1 three-star, and 1 one-star. That concentration at the top end is statistically unusual and worth noting without overstating.

The dominant theme across the dataset is staff quality, appearing in 115 of 166 reviews (69.3%). This is the single most frequently cited factor, outpacing every other theme by a wide margin. Subjective results follow at 70 reviews (42.2%), meaning patients are describing felt improvement in their condition rather than simply rating the experience. Prescriber quality surfaces in 41 reviews (24.7%), a notably high figure for a practice where the clinical lead is named repeatedly. Facility quality appears in 24 reviews (14.5%), intake process in 16 (9.6%), communication in 13 (7.8%), specific measurable results in 11 (6.6%), and follow-up care in 11 (6.6%).

The staff quality theme carries zero negative sentiment across all 115 mentions. Prescriber quality and facility quality are similarly clean. The only negative sentiment in the dataset appears in two results-related reviews and one follow-up care review, out of 70 and 11 respectively.

Several reviews describe the intake process as thorough and transparent, with patients noting that procedures were explained before treatment began. A patient recovering from sciatica described arriving "on literally my hands and knees" and eventually reaching a pain-free state without surgery, continuing with preventive care at the practice. A jeweler who works under a microscope daily described returning to the clinic whenever musculoskeletal issues arise and consistently achieving full recovery. These are not first-visit impressions; they represent multi-visit relationships.

---

The Standout Case: A Patient's Documented Health Turnaround

Among the 166 reviews, one stands out for its specificity and length. A former Special Forces operator and semi-pro MMA fighter described arriving at the clinic in August 2025 weighing 283 pounds, with triglycerides in the 800s, an A1C out of range, and a prediabetic diagnosis. He had been dieting and exercising since January of that year, losing roughly 20 pounds over seven months while remaining stagnant at around 260 pounds. After beginning EBOO (Extracorporeal Blood Oxygenation and Ozone Therapy) combined with Red Light Therapy at the Fleming Island clinic, he reported his weight dropping from the 270s to 244 pounds between August and October, with his visceral fat index falling from 18 to 15. He described tracking cardiovascular data via wearable devices and noted that his SpO2 climbed from the 89-92 range to 97-98 during the same period.

This is a single patient account, not a clinical study. The reviewer disclosed his methodology, acknowledged prior lifestyle changes, and attributed the specific period of change to the EBOO sessions. The review is notable for its transparency about what changed and when, and it is presented here as a patient-reported experience, not as a generalizable outcome.

---

Specific Results Reported by Fleming Island Patients

Beyond the EBOO account, the results-specific theme appears in 11 reviews with entirely positive sentiment. Patients describe outcomes including improved mobility following X-ray imaging, relief from foot and back pain following acoustic wave and PRP treatments, and neck and lower back improvement after chiropractic and wellness care.

One patient described a lifelong history of back issues and noted relief after the first visit following a thorough consultation. Another described working toward avoiding surgery through physical therapy and treatments, characterizing the process as "challenging, but beneficial." These descriptions reflect a range of starting points and timelines, which is consistent with a practice handling chronic and complex musculoskeletal cases rather than routine acute care.

---

Honest Breakdown: Where the Record Is Less Clear

The Fleming Island clinic has only four reviews below five stars across 166 total, falling short of the five-review threshold that would warrant a dedicated critical section. The breakdown: one one-star review, one three-star review, and two four-star reviews.

Given that low count, the friction analysis is folded here. The two results-related reviews with negative sentiment and the single follow-up care review with negative sentiment suggest that a small minority of patients did not experience the outcomes they anticipated. This is not unusual for a practice offering regenerative and energy-based therapies, where individual response varies and timelines are not predictable.

The three-star review in the dataset does not appear in the verbatim excerpts provided, so its specific content cannot be quoted or characterized here. The one-star review is similarly absent from the excerpt set. What can be said from the data structure is that negative sentiment appears only in results-related and follow-up categories, not in staff quality, prescriber quality, facility quality, or communication. Patient dissatisfaction at this practice, where it exists, appears to center on outcomes rather than on how the clinic conducts itself.

Prospective patients with specific outcome expectations, particularly around regenerative therapies like stem cell or PRP, should approach the consultation as an opportunity to ask direct questions about realistic timelines and individual variability.

---

When Select Health and Wellness in Fleming Island Is Not the Right Fit

This practice is not structured as a primary care or urgent care facility. Patients seeking conventional insurance-billed general medicine, prescription management for chronic conditions, or same-day acute care will find the service menu misaligned with those needs.

The treatment menu, which includes stem cell therapy, NAD+ infusions, and acoustic wave therapy, reflects a cash-pay or out-of-pocket model common in integrative and regenerative medicine. Pricing is not published on the clinic's website, and the EBOO reviewer explicitly noted that "the procedure is expensive." Patients on tight budgets or expecting insurance reimbursement for these services should confirm coverage and pricing before booking.

The clinic closes on Thursdays [source: clinic hours data], which may be a scheduling constraint for patients who can only access care mid-week.

Patients who prefer a more conservative, evidence-based-only clinical approach may find the breadth of modalities, particularly energy therapies and ozone-based IV protocols, outside their comfort zone. The practice does not appear to position itself as a replacement for conventional medicine; several reviews reference it as a complement to ongoing care or as an alternative to surgery in specific cases.

---

How Select Health and Wellness Compares in the Fleming Island Market

One direct competitor operates in the Fleming Island area: Gameday Men's Health Fleming Island TRT and Peptide Clinic [source: competitor data], which carries a 5.0 rating across 96 reviews.

The two practices serve overlapping but distinct patient populations. Gameday Men's Health, as the name indicates, focuses on male hormone optimization and peptide protocols. Select Health and Wellness covers a broader clinical scope, including musculoskeletal pain management, metabolic therapies, and women's wellness, based on review content. A male patient seeking testosterone replacement therapy might find Gameday's specialization appealing; a patient dealing with chronic back pain, metabolic concerns, or seeking regenerative joint treatment would find Select's menu more directly relevant.

---

Frequently Asked Questions: What Fleming Island Patients Actually Ask

What does the first visit look like at Select Health and Wellness?

Multiple reviews describe the initial consultation as thorough and explanatory. Patients note that Dr. Fritz and his staff take time to identify the source of the problem before proposing a treatment plan. One reviewer described the consult as covering "a very good treatment plan to follow" and noted that the evaluation process was completed "in a professional manner." Another described relief beginning after the first visit following a detailed intake.

Expect the first appointment to include a health history review, discussion of symptoms and goals, and a proposed protocol rather than immediate treatment in all cases.

Is Dr. Fritz personally involved in patient care, or is it primarily staff-driven?

Based on the review record, Dr. Fritz is personally named in a significant portion of the 166 reviews, including the prescriber quality theme, which appears in 41 reviews (24.7% of the total). Reviewers describe direct interactions with him during consultations and treatment sessions. The practice does not appear to be structured so that the physician is primarily administrative.

How does the staff compare to other clinics in the area?

Staff quality is the single most frequently cited theme in the review dataset, appearing in 115 of 166 reviews (69.3%) with zero negative sentiment. Reviewers use terms like "cheerful," "welcoming," "caring," and "down to earth" with notable consistency. The reception-to-clinical-staff continuum is specifically mentioned in facility and staff reviews.

Can the clinic help patients avoid surgery?

Several reviews describe patients pursuing treatment specifically as an alternative to surgery, and some report successful outcomes in that context. One patient described working to avoid surgery through physical therapy and treatments. Another described recovering from debilitating sciatica without surgical intervention. These are individual patient accounts and should not be interpreted as a general guarantee.

What conditions do Fleming Island patients most commonly bring to this clinic?

Based on review content, the most frequently described presenting conditions include lower back pain, neck pain, sciatica, joint pain, foot pain, and metabolic health concerns. The practice also sees patients for men's sexual health issues (ED Treatment and Acoustic Wave Therapy are listed services) and general wellness optimization via IV and NAD+ protocols.

How long does treatment typically take before patients notice changes?

The review data does not provide a uniform timeline. Some patients describe noticing changes after the first visit; others describe improvement over multiple months of care. The EBOO reviewer noted measurable changes beginning within the week of his first session. The X-ray improvement reviewer described results after an extended course of treatment. Individual variation appears to be significant, and the intake process at the clinic appears designed to set expectations accordingly.

Is the clinic appropriate for patients who have already tried conventional medicine without success?

A recurring pattern in the reviews is patients arriving after conventional approaches, including pain medication and surgery recommendations, have either failed or been declined. The clinic's integrative approach appears to attract this population specifically. One reviewer described arriving "on literally my hands and knees" with sciatica and ultimately achieving a pain-free state without surgery. Another described years of back issues and X-ray evidence of improvement after treatment.

What is the facility like physically?

Facility quality appears in 24 reviews (14.5%) with entirely positive sentiment. Reviewers describe the space as clean, orderly, and welcoming. The multi-suite layout at 1845 E West Pkwy accommodates a range of treatment modalities, and reviewers note that the physical environment reflects the clinical standards of the practice.

Does the clinic offer ongoing or maintenance care, or is it primarily acute treatment?

Follow-up care appears as a theme in 11 reviews. Several patients describe continuing with the practice after their primary concern resolved, either for maintenance or preventive purposes. The sciatica patient described continuing care "indefinitely" for health benefits. A jeweler described returning to the clinic whenever new musculoskeletal issues arise. The practice appears to accommodate both acute and long-term patient relationships.

How does Select Health and Wellness handle patient communication about procedures?

Communication appears as a theme in 13 reviews (7.8%), all with positive sentiment. Reviewers consistently note that staff explain what is happening before and during procedures, answer questions clearly, and ensure patients understand the process. This pattern appears in both initial consultation reviews and ongoing care reviews.

Are the IV and NAD+ therapies a significant part of what this Fleming Island clinic does?

IV Therapy and NAD+ Therapy are listed services [source: clinic service data], but the review record does not surface these as frequently discussed as musculoskeletal treatments. The EBOO review is the most detailed account of an infusion-adjacent therapy. Patients interested specifically in IV or NAD+ protocols should ask directly during consultation about the clinic's experience and protocols for those services.

What is the realistic cost expectation for treatment at this practice?

Pricing is not published in the source data, and the review record does not provide specific figures. The EBOO reviewer noted that "the procedure is expensive" while framing the cost in terms of the alternative health consequences of not treating. Regenerative therapies such as stem cell and PRP are generally not covered by standard insurance plans. Patients should request a detailed cost breakdown during the initial consultation before committing to a treatment plan.

---

Review data sourced from 166 verified Google reviews dated February 2024 through April 2026. Star distribution: 162 five-star, 2 four-star, 1 three-star, 1 one-star. All verbatim quotes reproduced as written, truncated at sentence boundaries where indicated. Clinic information sourced from [source: https://www.selecthealthandwellness.com/location/fleming-island-florida].

---

This is not a treatment recommendation. It is a directory entry. Any treatment decision belongs with a licensed physician who can examine the patient and evaluate their specific case.